Analysis of Image Coders

Authors

  • Shefa Hasnain
  • Sadiya Bakhshi
  • Shazia Asif
  • Monauwer Alam

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper we work on the performance analysis of well-known image compression algorithm i.e., wavelet based image compression which is Set Partition in Hierarchical Tree (SPIHT) and also no list SPIHT (NLS). As SPIHT uses three variable lists which require large hardware implementation and hence extra cost and high encoding and decoding time is required but NLS use marker instead of list which are placed on lower nodes of insignificant tree hence it requires less hardware and hence it is less complex then SPIHT and time of decoding and encoding is also inferior to SPIHT. The algorithm are implemented in MATLAB and compared using the parameter peak signal to noise ratio PSNR, encoding time and decoding time. Using the NLS technique the image obtained has less encoding as well as decoding time as compared to SPIHT but in context SNR SPIHT is better.

 

Keywords: SPIHT, NLS, PSNR, Performance analysis, Bits per pixel


Cite this Article

Shefa Hasnain, Sadiya Bakhshi, Shazia Asif et al. Analysis of image coders. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research & Advances. 2016; 3(3):     26–30p.


Downloads

Published

2017-01-02

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2016)

Section

Research Articles

License

Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form

(to be completed by authors)

I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.

  • I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
  • I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
  • I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
  •  I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:

Author’s name                                    

 

1. ________________

2. ________________

3. ________________

4. ________________

 

We  Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal.