A Review on the GNU Project

Authors

  • Shruti Bhandari
  • Arti Mishra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37591/joosd.v3i3.899

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper, I sketch the characteristics of an GNU project by considering a number of prominent examples, reviewing sociological literature, teasing apart the concepts of open and voluntary implicit in most usages of the term, and I offer a definition in which the much maligned possibility of forking is actually an integral aspect of openness. The objective of the GNU project was to make a free form of the UNIX registering environment, with which numerous PC specialists knew about, and even added to, however was progressively being hampered with exclusive cases. GNU is fun loving type of a recursive acronym: GNU is not Unix. The processing environment should be like, however free of UNIX and incorporate everything, a client required, including a working framework portion and regular applications, for example, little utilities, content managers and programming compilers.

 

Keywords: GNU, FSF, LINUX

Cite this Article

Shruti Bhandari, Arti Mishra. A Review on the GNU Project. Journal of Open Source Developments. 2016; 3(3): 3–5p.



Downloads

Published

2017-02-19

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (2016)

Section

Review Articles

License

Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form

(to be completed by authors)

I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.

  • I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
  • I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
  • I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
  •  I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:

Author’s name                                    

 

1. ________________

2. ________________

3. ________________

4. ________________

 

We  Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal.