Linux vs FreeBSD: a comparative evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37591/joosdt.v5i1.1602Abstract
Linux and FreeBSD are both favorite, full featured, advanced open-source operating systems. They present many similarities owning mainly to their common UNIX heritage and their monolithic structure. Both systems support dynamically loaded kernel modules that expand their functionality. Also, they provide a similar set of system calls, and their interrupt handling, and virtual memory management systems adopt many common patterns. However, there are also significant differences. In particular Linux tends to implement less layered code, that can offer efficiency gains, however sometimes at a loss of some modularity.
The paper compares their core kernel architecture and functionality. The subsystems examined are interrupt handling, scheduling and memory management. For each subsystem the design approaches of Linux and FreeBSD are elucidated theoretically in order to enlighten the differences. Finally, performance benchmarks are provided that illustrate the efficiency of the operating systems at characteristic sets of basic operations.
Keywords: Scheduling, memory management, threads, paging, interrupts, benchmarking
Cite this Article
Stergios Papadimitriou, Lefteris Moussiades. Linux versus Free BSD: A Comparative Evaluation. Journal of Operating Systems Development & Trends. 2018; 5(1): 1–10p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form
(to be completed by authors)
I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.
- I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
- I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
- I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
- I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:
Author’s name
1. ________________
2. ________________
3. ________________
4. ________________
| We Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal. |