Multicast Authentication Protocol in the Two-way Relay Channel with Active Attackers

Authors

  • N. Viji Department of Computer Science, AVS College of Arts and Science, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India
  • B. Jayanthy Department of Computer Science, AVS College of Arts and Science, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37591/joosdt.v3i1.711

Abstract

An effective key generation scheme that achieves a substantially larger key rate than that of a direct channel mimic approach. Existing schemes, there is need for the key generating terminals to obtain correlated observations in our scheme. It also investigate the effects of an active attacker on the proposed key a novel multicast authentication protocol, namely MABS, including two schemes. The basic scheme (MABS-B) eliminates the correlation among packets and thus provides the perfect resilience to packet loss, and it is also efficient in terms of latency, computation, and communication overhead due to an efficient cryptographic primitive called batch signature, which supports the authentication of any number of packets simultaneously. It also present an enhanced scheme MABS-E, which combines the basic scheme with a packet filtering mechanism to alleviate the DoS impact while preserving the perfect resilience to packet loss.

Keywords: MABS, packet filtering mechanism, video broadcast, probability distribution function (pdf), UWB

Cite this Article
N. Viji, B. Jayanthy. Multicast Authentication Protocol in the Two-Way Relay Channel With Active Attackers. Journal of Operating Systems Development & Trends. 2016; 3(1): 22–30p.

References

Zhou H, Huie L and Lai L. Key generation in two-way relay wireless channels. Proc. 17th Annu. Conf. Inf. Sci. Syst., Baltimore, MD, USA. 2013: 1–6p.

Wilson R, Tse D, and Scholtz R. Channel identification: Secret sharing using reciprocity in UWB channels. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security. 2007; 2(3): 364–375p.

Ye C et al. Information-theoretically secret key generation for fading wireless channels. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security. 2010; 5(2): 240–254p.

Lai L, Liang Y, and Poor H V. A unified framework for key agreement over wireless fading channels. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security. 2012; 7(2): 480–490p.

Sayeed A, Perrig A. Secure wireless communications: Secret keys through multipath. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoustics, Speech, Signal Process., Las Vegas, NV, USA. 2008: 30–31p.

Mathur S et al. Radiotelepathy: Extracting a secret key from an unauthenticated wireless channel. in Proc. 14th ACM Int. Conf. Mobile Comput. Netw., San Francisco, CA, USA. 2008:128–139p.

Zeng K, Wu D, Chan A, and Mohapatra P. Exploiting multiple antenna diversity for shared key generation in wireless networks. Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, San Diego, CA, USA. 2010: 1–6p.

Wang Q, Xu K, Ren K. Cooperative secret key generation from phase estimation in narrowband fading channels. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2009; 30(9): 1666–1674p.

Shimizu T, Iwai H, and Sasaoka H. Physical-layer secret key agreement in two-way wireless relaying. IEEE Trans.

Inf. Forensics Security. 2011; 6(3): 650–660p.

Lai L, Liang Y, and Du W. Cooperative key generation in wireless network. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2012; 30(8): 1578–1588p.

Rafaeli S and Hutchison D. A Survey of Key Management for Secure Group Communication. ACM Computing Surveys. 2003; 35(3): 309–329p.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-03

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016)

Section

Research Articles

License

Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form

(to be completed by authors)

I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.

  • I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
  • I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
  • I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
  •  I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:

Author’s name                                    

 

1. ________________

2. ________________

3. ________________

4. ________________

 

We  Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal.