A Survey on Designing of OpenMP, UPC and MPI

Authors

  • Ashwani Wantoo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37591/rtpc.v4i2.1073

Abstract

Abstract

The present pattern to multicore designs underscores the need of parallelism. While new dialects and options for supporting all the more proficiently, these frameworks are proposed, MPI confronts this new test. Along these lines, execution assessments of current alternatives for programming multicore frameworks are required. This paper assesses MPI execution against Unified Parallel C (UPC) and OpenMP on multicore designs. From the investigation of the outcomes, it can be reasoned that MPI is the best decision on multicore frameworks with both shared and hybrid shared/circulated memory, as it takes the most astounding favourable position of information area, the key factor for execution in these frameworks. With respect to, in spite of the fact that it misuses effectively the information format in memory, it experiences remote shared memory gets to, though OpenMP generally needs productive information region bolster and is confined to shared memory frameworks, which constrains its adaptability.

Keywords: MPI, UPC, OpenMP, multicore architectures, performance evaluation, NAS parallel benchmarks (NPB)

Cite this Article

Ashwani Wantoo. A Survey on Designing of OpenMP, UPC and MPI. Recent Trends in Parallel Computing. 2017; 4(2): 21–26p.


Downloads

Published

2017-09-08

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2017)

Section

Review Articles

License

Declaration and Copyright Transfer Form

(to be completed by authors)

I/ We, the undersigned author(s) of the submitted manuscript, hereby declare, that the above manuscript which is submitted for publication in the STM Journals(s), is not published already in part or whole (except in the form of abstract) in any journal or magazine for private or public circulation, and, is not under consideration of publication elsewhere.

  • I/We will not withdraw the manuscript after 1 week of submission as I have read the Author Guidelines and will adhere to the guidelines.
  • I/We Author(s ) have niether given nor will give this manuscript elsewhere for publishing after submitting in STM Journal(s).
  • I/ We have read the original version of the manuscript and am/ are responsible for the thought contents embodied in it. The work dealt in the manuscript is my/ our own, and my/ our individual contribution to this work is significant enough to qualify for authorship.
  •  I/We also agree to the authorship of the article in the following order:

Author’s name                                    

 

1. ________________

2. ________________

3. ________________

4. ________________

 

We  Author(s) tick this box and would request you to consider it as our signature as we agree to the terms of this Copyright Notice, which will apply to this submission if and when it is published by this journal.