Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Requirement of the Dynamic Metrics to Measure the Behaviour of Component-based Software

Parveen Kumar, Pradeep Tomar


Software component has been developed lively. Component-based Software Development (CBSD) is becoming more generalized, representing a considerable market for the software industry. However, the measurements of software components have become an integral part of software development and are used during every phase of the software development life cycle. With the help of conventional static metrics we are not able to analyse various facts of software. It is very important to understand the dynamic behaviour of the program or an application in developing new effective strategies in computer science. This paper introduces the foundation dynamic metrics. In this paper we will discuss the various aspects for software metrics, and the comparison between static and dynamic metrics. The main aim of the paper is identify the different requirements for the dynamic metrics for a Component-Based Software Development. These requirements play the important role to describe the dynamic behaviour of Component-Based Software.

Keywords: Software Component, CBSD, Static Metrics, Dynamic Metrics.

Full Text:



Brown A.W., Wallnau K.C., The Current State of CBSE, IEEE Software 1998; 155: 37–46p. 2. Mills H.D., The Management of the Software Engineering, PART 1: Principle of Software Engineering. IBM System J. 1999; 38(2/3): 289–295p.

H F Li, Cheung W K., An Empirical Study of Software Metrics, Software Engineering IEEE Transactions on 1987; SE-13(6): 697–708p. 4. Fenton E., Software Metrics. Conference Proceedings of the Future of Software Engineering ICSE. Publisher: ACM Press, 2000; 8(2). 5. Tu Honglei, Sun Wei, Zhang Yanan, The Research of Software Metric and Software Complexity Metrics, International Forum on Computer Science Technology and Applications. Publisher: IEEE. 2009. 6. Mitchell A., Power J.F. Using Object-level Run-time Metrics to Study Coupling between Objects, ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Santa Fe, NM, 2005, 1456–1462p. 7. Yacoub S., Ammar H., Robinson T., Dynamic Metrics for Object-Oriented Design, Proc. of the 6th IEEE International Symposium on Software Metrics. 1998. 8. Thirumalai Selvi R., George T. Manohar, Balasubramanian N.V., Analysing the Problem and Solution Oriented Metrics for Traditional and Component Based Framewroks for Web Applications, Developer IQ Asia’ s #1 Software Technology Magazine 2007; 7(5): 46–54p. 9. Varun Gupta, Measurement of Dynamic Metrics using Dynamic Analysis of Programs, in proceedings of the WSEAS Conference on Applied Computing Conference, Istanbul Turkey, 2008, 81–86p. 10. Varun Gupta, A Survey of Dynamic Software Metrics, Springer, 2010. 11. Manik Sharma, Gurdev Singh, Static and Dynamic metrics-A Comparative Analysis, Emerg. T. Comput. Info. Technol. 2011. 12. Kamaljit Kaur, Kirti Minhas, Static and Dynamic Complexity Analysis of Software, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 2009, 2009-08-23. 13. Bruno Dufour, Karel Driesen, Laurie Hendren, et al. Dynamic Metrics for Java, ACM 158113712, 2003. 14. Aggarwal K.K., Yogesh Singh, Jitender Kumar Chhabra, A Dynamic Software Metric and Debugging Tool, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2003; 28(2): 1–4p.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

This site has been shifted to